Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Evolutionary Bioinformatics

749,593 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

TreeCmp: Comparison of Trees in Polynomial Time

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 06 Aug 2012

Type: Software review

Journal: Evolutionary Bioinformatics

Citation: Evolutionary Bioinformatics 2012:8 475-487

doi: 10.4137/EBO.S9657

Abstract

When a phylogenetic reconstruction does not result in one tree but in several, tree metrics permit finding out how far the reconstructed trees are from one another. They also permit to assess the accuracy of a reconstruction if a true tree is known. TreeCmp implements eight metrics that can be calculated in polynomial time for arbitrary (not only bifurcating) trees: four for unrooted (Matching Split metric, which we have recently proposed, Robinson-Foulds, Path Difference, Quartet) and four for rooted trees (Matching Cluster, Robinson-Foulds cluster, Nodal Splitted and Triple). TreeCmp is the first implementation of Matching Split/Cluster metrics and the first efficient and convenient implementation of Nodal Splitted. It allows to compare relatively large trees. We provide an example of the application of TreeCmp to compare the accuracy of ten approaches to phylogenetic reconstruction with trees up to 5000 external nodes, using a measure of accuracy based on normalized similarity between trees.


Downloads

PDF  (665.67 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

Supplementary Files 1  (1.80 MB ZIP FORMAT)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)


Sharing


Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Evolutionary Bioinformatics
I must say publishing with Evolutionary Bioinformatics was a great and partially unexpected experience.  It allowed me to understand the name 'Libertas Academica' is not just a name but a real issue.  The reviewers offered us stringent, rigorous but totally unprejudiced comments, the editor supported us and the paper visibility was very good.  Thank you again.
Dr Alessandro Giuliani (Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Roma, Italy)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results