Close
Help
Need Help?



The Double U Wave—Should the Electrocardiogram be Interpreted Echocardiographically?

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 07 Sep 2010

Type: Original Research

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology

Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology 2010:4 77-83

doi: 10.4137/CMC.S5892

Abstract

The U wave is still an electrocardiographic deflection of enigmatic origin. Numerous hypotheses on its origin have been formulated, but to date none has been conclusively proven. Recently, a report described the first case of bifid (or notched) U waves. Until then this phenomenon has only been described in the T wave. This is the first report of double U waves—two separate deflections, ascribed to an accessory papillary muscle.

Hypothesis: The presence of a double U wave will be associated with an accessory papillary muscle (s).

Materials and methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 4729 patient files of patients who were evaluated at a cardiology practice. The 12-lead surface electrocardiogram was evaluated for the possible presence of a double U wave. In cases where a double U wave was found, the transthoracic echocardiogram was then scrutinized for the presence of an accessory papillary muscle.

Results: A total of 3 cases of a double U wave were found. In every case an accessory papillary muscle was clearly seen on the transthoracic echocardiogram.

Conclusion: A double U wave is a new variant of an old electrocardiographic deflection of enigmatic origin. This variant may be associated with an accessory papillary muscle.


Downloads

PDF  (3.59 MB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology
Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology is very much conscious of time. Every step is done thoroughly and rapidly.  The reviewers' comments are constructive. There is regular contact with the authors, providing explanations where necessary.  The visibility also enjoyed by one's article once it is published is worthy of note.  Thanks for making publishing with you so easy and enjoyable.
Dr Pat Akinwusi (Osun State University and Ladoke Akintola University Teaching Hospital, Osogbo, Nigeria)
More Testimonials

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email AlertsRSS Feeds
FacebookGoogle+Twitter
PinterestTumblrYouTube

SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results