Thanks to your very detailed and specific guidelines for reviewing a submitted manuscript, it was very easy to stick to the reviewing policy of your journal. Thus reviewing was a very structured, lean, and efficient process. I feel honored if I could have contributed to improving the already valuable content. Do not hesitate to involve me in reviewing further manuscripts if you think my expertise could be beneficial for Open Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery.
It is my great pleasure to serve as a peer reviewer for LA. The interface of the website is well designed: straightforward and friendly to navigate. I imagine authors love the prompt review process, and readers will benefit from LA open access journals.
I would like to echo the endorsement of Dr. Yi Hong Zhou of UC Irvine, the corresponding author on our paper in Biomarker Insights. We found that reviewers provided reviews quickly without sacrificing professionalism. And overall, we were very happy with our experience with Libertas Academica.
The publishing experience in Libertas Academica journals is unique. Readers can feel satisfied that publications are peer reviewed. Authors follow simple steps to reach final stage of publication. All readers have access to articles. Journal subscriptions or medical library access is not needed.
- Dr Akram Al Hilali
(Consultant Hematopathologist, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai)
Publishing in Clinical Medicine Reviews in Vascular Health was a pleasant experience. The process was fast and fair. The staff were very professional and we were well informed of the progress of the manuscript.
This is the fastest progress we have experienced from submission to acceptance. Reviews are fast, pertinent, and instructive. Every step of the process is visible and prompt, and every email is friendly and immediate. In all, it is an excellent experience to be published in Libertas Academica.
I have had a great experience with submitting my cancer prognosis study to Biomarker Insights. The comments from reviewers and associate editor are high quality and insightful. Congratulations and keep up the good work.
- Dr Yi Hong Zhou
(University of California, Irvine, CA, USA)
The experience with the journal was excellent. The submission process with simple, reviews were expedited quickly, and communication with the corresponding author was excellent.
- Dr Andrew Briggs
(Curtin University, Australia)
The editorial staff of Biomarkers in Cancer are very efficient and helpful. I am happy to work with them. I look forward to reviewing future manuscripts.
It's been a great experience publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics. I'm really impressed with the high quality, professional and constructive of peer review in the short time-frame. The editorial team is very helpful and I always received quick answers when I had questions. I am glad to have worked with Libertas Academica and I highly recommend publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics.
Our experience publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology was the easiest and most user-friendly interface we have encountered. The staff were very attentive to us and kept us posted at every step of the process. It was rewarding to have our article appear in press within weeks, compared to months at other journals.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)
FacebookGoogle+Twitter
PinterestTumblrYouTube