Close
Help


What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Reviews in Oncology
Our Testimonials
Author Survey Results Journal Testimonials

Testimonials are kindly provided by authors and peer reviewers who have previously worked with Libertas and are reproduced here with their consent.


Featured Testimonials

 

"Working with Libertas Academica was the smoothest publication experience I have had.  The coordinators at Healthy Aging & Clinical Care in the Elderly were consistently available to answer questions and helped my paper progress through the publication stages in a very timely manner.  The reviewers provided excellent suggestions that greatly increased the quality of the paper as well.  This was a fantastic group of individuals with which to work."  (Dr Rachel Messer, Oklahoma State University)

 

"I was delighted with the speed and efficiency with which my paper was processed. The friendly and personal communications with editorial staff also made the experience extremely pleasant and easy. I should be happy to recommend International Journal of Tryptophan Research to anyone."  (Professor Trevor Stone, University of Glasgow)

I was requested to contribute a review. The objectives, timelines and process were all extremely reasonable and fit in well with my knowledge base and my work as well as my schedule. The process was quite seamless and no paper was ever exchanged--everything was completed on-line. Thanks for the opportunity to make this contribution.


- Dr Michael E. Trigg
(North Wales, PA, USA)

The process of submitting the paper was smooth with little time required on the author's behalf. Reviews were prompt and the process of addressing reviewer comments was very streamlined. All correspondence with the editorial office was extremely professional with immediate responses. This is one of the few journals asking for feedback on their submission process.


- Dr Greg Trottier, MD, PhD, FRCSC
(University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada)

Our Service Promise

  • Efficient Processing: 4 Weeks Average to First Editorial Decision
  • Fair & Independent Expert Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Database Coverage
What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Reviews in Oncology
The process of submitting the paper was smooth with little time required on the author's behalf. Reviews were prompt and the process of addressing reviewer comments was very streamlined. All correspondence with the editorial office was extremely professional with immediate responses. This is one of the few journals asking for feedback on their submission process.
Dr Greg Trottier, MD, PhD, FRCSC (University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube