The staff of Libertas Academica have been exceptionally easy to work with. They continually keep authors updated and are responsive to all requests. They were also very flexible to work with when I had some challenges from my end as an author. Article reviews were received very promptly and were constructive and helpful for improving the manuscript. The online submission system was easy to use and provided clear guidance on what was needed. I highly recommend Libertas Academica and their excellent team.
- Dr Brian Gates
(Washington State University College of Pharmacy, Spokane WA, USA)
I have had contact with Drug Target Insights several times, and every time I am impressed by the handling of the manuscript. The website is very, very user-friendly. It is easy to submit a manuscript. The entire process is easy and straightforward. The corresponding author is kept updated on the progress at every point. The editors of Libertas were helpful and prompt in responding to questions and issues related to the submission I am pleased to send this endorsement and I recommend the publisher to my colleagues.
- Dr Bodil Ohlsson
(Lund University, Sweden)
I must say publishing with Evolutionary Bioinformatics was a great and partially unexpected experience. It allowed me to understand the name 'Libertas Academica' is not just a name but a real issue. The reviewers offered us stringent, rigorous but totally unprejudiced comments, the editor supported us and the paper visibility was very good. Thank you again.
- Dr Alessandro Giuliani
(Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Roma, Italy)
This is my second publication with Libertas. I greatly appreciate the attention to details throughout the process, especially the graphical enhancement of my figures. The author interface was very easy to use and the turnaround time on your end was swift and accurate. I compliment you and your team on your administrative efficiency and high quality of work.
Libertas Academica really cares about authors of submitted papers. Its policy guarantees that every submitted paper will receive responsible and professional review comments.
My experience with LA was great. Submission was easy and smooth. Reviews were speedy - I got three reviewers' comments back within 2 weeks! I also received email notifications of the progress updates on my submission. The process of addressing reviewers' comments was streamlined and easy for the authors.
The team at Evolutionary Bioinformatics were fantastic in everyway. They were very accesible and helped with all aspects of getting the paper published in a timely fashion. The immediate online help option avaliable through the website is a great option.
Publishing in Cancer Informatics was the fastest publication I have ever experienced and has received the highest viewing rate. So it is a great place to publish your very latest research.
The process of submission and publishing was a great experience. During the few weeks from the submission to publication I have worked with high quality staff. In my opinion, the easy communication was the most important characteristic of Libertas and an important influence on the final quality of the article. I definitely recommend the publisher to my colleagues.
I would like to say that this is the most author-friendly editing process I have experienced. The publishing process of this journal was a most pleasant and productive experience, and it was fast and convenient to me.
It's been a great experience publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics. I'm really impressed with the high quality, professional and constructive of peer review in the short time-frame. The editorial team is very helpful and I always received quick answers when I had questions. I am glad to have worked with Libertas Academica and I highly recommend publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)
FacebookGoogle+Twitter
PinterestTumblrYouTube