It has been a great pleasure to be a peer reviewer for Clinical Medicine Reviews in Vascular Health.  The Aims & Scope of the journal ensures a clearly defined focus.  The editorial process is highly efficient.  The quality of the manuscripts I have been reviewing is generally exceptional.

My experience with Libertas Academica was an extremely positive, satisfying and rewarding one.  The process was exceptionally smooth, the author interface unusually user-friendly, and the editorial team unbelievably supportive.  Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed my publishing experience with Libertas Academica and would gladly welcome the opportunity to publish with them again.  Thank you for such a painless and gratifying publication process!

Publishing in Gene Regulation and Systems Biology was a very positive experience.  I was impressed by the fast and uncomplicated submission process as well as the clear and professional peer review process which helped to improve the manuscript.  The Libertas Academica team was very patient and helpful.  I would definitely recommend the journal to other colleagues in the field!

- Dr Cameron Moshfegh
(Federal Institute of Technology, Switzerland)

I am very impressed with your professional editorial team. They have my highest recommendation. It is a pleasurable experience to work with such a team.

As an author of a review published in Translational Oncogenomics, I was impressed by the prompt processing and speed of publication. The entire submission, review and publication process was easy, quick and pleasant. The comments from reviewers and associate editor were high quality, scientifically deep and objective. It was a great pleasure to cooperate with such qualified and friendly team. I highly recommend publication in Libertas Academica journals.

Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports was very thorough. I appreciated the way you painstakingly followed all the processes of verifying submitted manuscripts for publication.  It shows that you do not just allow anything to pass for publication!  Please keep the good work. Science and indeed biological research should be verifiable and dynamic.

- Dr Ali Ishaq Shugaba
(University of Jos, Nigeria)

Working with the editorial staff and reviewers for Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics was a positive experience.  The online submission/revision process was easy and staff were readily available to answer any questions.  Reviewers were knowledgeable, lending expert comments that allowed for improvement in content information.  I highly recommend others practitioners and researchers to consider Libertas Academica journals for their next publication.

I would like to express my gratitude and say that publishing in LA's journals is one of the best experiences I have had.  I will certainly continue with LA's journals in the future.  the unique feature of this publisher is that it provides a research platform for all young researchers.  Thank you for providing a sustainable publishing environment for us.

The submission and publishing process was a good experience.  During the last few weeks from the submission to publication I have worked with high quality staff.  In my opinion, the easy communication was the most important characteristic of Libertas and an important influence on the final quality of the article.  I definitely recommend the publisher to my co-workers.

- Dr Reinhardt Pinzon
(Universidad Tecnologica de Panama, Panama)

This is the second time I have submitted a paper to Palliative Care: Research and Treatment for possible publication.  In both instances, my experience with Libertas Academica was very good from submission to acceptance.  The peer reviewers' comments were insightful, very constructive, and extremely helpful.  The author interface was user-friendly.  The publishing process was fast and convenient. I highly recommend this journal.

- Dr Liza Manalo
(Palliative Care Unit, Cancer Center, The Medical City, Pasig City, Philippines)