Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Signal Transduction Insights

14,250 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics


Is this journal right for my paper?

Ask Editor in Chief
Submit a Paper

Editor in Chief: Edgar Grinstein

Aims & Scope: Signal Transduction Insights is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that covers all aspect... more

Indexing & Databases: Chemical Abstracts Service, Chinese Electronic Periodical Service, EBSCO Academic Search Complete, Gale Academic OneFile, Gale Health Reference Centre, Gale InfoTrac Custom Journals, Illustrata-Technology, Index Copernicus, OAlster, ProQuest SciTech, ProQuest Technology, Socolar

Journal Directories: Academic Journals Database, EBSCO A-Z, HINARI, JournalSeek, JournalTOCs, OAJSE, Scirus, Ulrich's Periodicals

Processing Speed: Editorial decision less than 3 weeks, publication in average 3 weeks after acceptance

ISSN: 1178-6434



Signup for Email Alerts and keep in touch with Signal Transduction Insights journal news, updates, events and articles

Article Search



Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to First Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Signal Transduction Insights
I found that publishing my paper in Signal Transduction Insights was a very satisfying experience. The submission process was simple, review rapid and thorough and the appearance of the article was first rate. I recommend this journal.
Dr Stuart K Calderwood (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston, Massachusetts, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results