Close
Help
Need Help?



The Reality in the Surveillance of Breast Cancer Survivors—Results of a Patient Survey

Submit a Paper


Libertas Analytics


2344 Article Views

Publication Date: 26 Feb 2008

Journal: Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research

Citation: Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research, 2008:1 17-23

BCbcr
journal

66,602 Article Views

3,608,208 Libertas Article Views

More Statistics

Stemmler Hans-Joachim1, Lässig Dorit1, Stieber Petra2, Bauerfeind Ingo3, Kahlert Steffen3, Fasching Peter Alexander4, Beckmann Matthias Wilhelm4, Glattes Margrit5, Goldmann-Posch Ursula6, Hoffmann Verena,1 Untch Michael7 and Heinemann Volker1

1Department of Hematology and Oncology. 2Department of clinical Chemistry. 3Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 1–3Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Klinikum Großhadern, Munich, Germany. 4Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Erlangen, Germany. 5AOK Rheinland/Hamburg, Germany. 6Mamazone e.V., Augsburg, Germany. 7Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Helios Klinikum, Berlin-Buch, Germany.

Abstract

Background: International guidelines for the surveillance of breast cancer patients recommend a minimized clinical follow-up including routine history and physical examination and regularly scheduled mammograms. However, the abandonment of scheduled follow-up examinations in breast cancer survivors remains a contradiction to established follow-up guidelines for other solid tumours.

Patients and Methods: We report the patients’ view on the basis of a survey performed in two separate geographical areas in Germany. The questionnaires were sent out to 2.658 patients with a history of breast cancer.

Results: A total of 801 patients (30.1%) responded to the questionnaire. The results of the survey can be summarized in two major categories: First, necessity for surveillance was affi rmed by a majority (>95%), and 47.8% of the organized patients answered that there was a need for more intensive diagnostic effort during follow-up. The main expectation from an intensified follow-up was the increased feeling of security as expressed by >80% of the women. Second, the present survey indicates that most of the regularly scheduled follow-up visits were expanded using extensive laboratory and imaging procedures exceeding the quantity of examinations recommended in the present follow-up guidelines.

Conclusion: Despite the fact that only one third of the patients responded to the questionnaire, the survey indicates that a majority of physicians who treated these patients still do not accept the present follow-up guidelines. To some extent this may be explained by the observation that patients and possibly also their doctors trust that intensified follow-up increases diagnostic security and survival. Since considerable changes in the treatment options of breast cancer have been made during the last decades a new trial of investigations in follow-up is warranted.


Post a Comment

x close

Discussion Add A Comment
No comments yet...Be the first to comment.


share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (Average 3 Weeks)
  • Fair & Constructive Peer Review
  • Professional Author Service
  • High Visibility
  • High Readership
  • What Our Authors Say

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers. RSS Feeds Email Alerts Twitter

BROWSE CATEGORIES
Our Testimonials
It is a great pleasure for me to be a peer reviewer for Libertas Academica.  The review process is efficient, well organized, and user friendly.  I encourage others to be a part of this team as an author or a peer reviewer/editor.  Thanks Libertas Academica editors and editorial management for maintaining this high level of quality and for their professionalism.
Dr Mahmud Hossain (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, Washington, USA) What our authors say