Close
Help
Need Help?



Non-parenteral Therapy for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Review of Efficacy, Tolerability and Factors Related to Patient Adherence

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 10 Mar 2011

Type: Review

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics

Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics 2011:3 113-124

doi: 10.4137/CMT.S2689

Abstract

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is defined as a group of diseases characterized by a progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) leading to right ventricular failure and premature death. Untreated, it is a potentially devastating disease. However, the past decade has seen remarkable improvements in our understanding of the pathology associated with the condition and the development of multiple PAH-specific therapies with the ability to alter the natural history of the disease. These new advances provide a significant opportunity for practitioners to detect and treat patients with PAH in a timely and effective manner, thereby improving overall mortality, morbidity, and quality of life associated with this disease. The aim of this review is two-fold: firstly to review the evidence for efficacy and safety of non-parenteral PAH therapies and to discuss treatment selection based on clinically meaningful differences among the approved therapies, such as the potential for serious drug-drug interactions, convenience of dosing schedules, and rates of limiting side effects. Secondly, the central role of the PAH clinical nurse in the multidisciplinary care of patients with PAH will be discussed, together with issues relating to adherence and interventions to enhance patient compliance.


Downloads

PDF  (539.47 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)


Sharing

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics
My publishing experience in Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics was great and enjoyable.  The whole process of publication was fast and smooth.  I highly recommend this journal.  Thank you very much and keep up the good work.
Dr Nada Zaki (Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia)
More Testimonials

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email AlertsRSS Feeds
FacebookGoogle+Twitter
PinterestTumblrYouTube

SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results