Close
Help
Need Help?



Peer Review Quality at Libertas

Posted Tue, Oct, 15,2013

Peer review is an important part of publishing papers in high quality peer review journals. When you submit a paper to Libertas you will be gaining intellectual support from our peer reviewers, who will see your work in a new perspective and offer constructive guidance. Don’t just take our word for it:

“The editorial staff of Drug Target Insights were very helpful and friendly.  The peer review report was constructive and helped to improve my manuscript.  I was impressed with the quick processing time.  I highly recommend this journal for publishing high quality articles” -Dr Lutful Amin -Stamford University Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh

All submissions to Libertas are subject to independent blind peer review by two to three peer reviewers. The Editors in Chief of each journal are responsible for editorial decisions ensuring that the review comments are constructive and comprehensive to be of use to the author. This approach helps to maintain the integrity of the journal by ensuring that the process has been rigorous but fair.

“In my experience Reproductive Biology Insights is a model for author-friendly open access journals, combining rigorous peer review with efficient speedy processing. It has been a pleasure--and no pain--working with such a good editorial and production team -In my experience Reproductive Biology Insights is a model for author-friendly open access journals, combining rigorous peer review with efficient speedy processing. It has been a pleasure--and no pain--working with such a good editorial and production team.” – Dr Mahmoud F. Fathalla -Assiut University, Egypt

Peer reviewers are selected based on their expertise. This guarantees you will always get high quality and subject appropriate reviewers for all of your submissions.

My co-authors and I had a very positive experience with the review and publication process in Evolutionary Bioinformatics.  The reviewers were rapid and on point, and publication was also rapid after we made the necessary revisions -Professor Steven Salzberg -Director, Center for Computational Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

To read more testimonials or to submit a manuscript please visit our website

share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
I am definitely impressed by the manner with which Libertas Academica handled the publication of our research paper.  The prompt reviews and other processes involved is a credit to the competence and experience of  staff of Libertas Academica.  Most outstanding is the friendly communications from the staff which kept us informed all the way through, providing guidance on our submission as it passed through a most rigorous peer review.  I would recommend Libertas Academica for ...
Associate Professor Nnodimele Onuigbo Atulomah MPH FRSPH (UK) (Babcock University, Ilishan Remo, Nigeria)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results