Close
Help
Need Help?



Libertas Images on Flickr

Posted Mon, Dec, 03,2012

Libertas is pleased to announce that articles with interesting images are now promoted through Flickr.

Flickr is a well-known image sharing website where users distribute images through a Photostream for interested users to view. Libertas has been using Flickr since February and has already reached over 16,000 image views.

Promoting articles with interesting images through Flickr increases article visibility owing to the website’s high rank in Google searches. All images have links back to the full text on the Libertas website to increase article visibility. Readers can browse Libertas’ photos by category and go to the full article in the Libertas journal.

Flickr is among the 50 most popular websites in the world and is widely used by 18-34 year olds with a higher level of education living in the US, UK, India, Germany, or Japan.

View the Libertas Flickr Photostream here

share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
My experience in publishing our manuscript in Environmental Health Insights was positive.  The speed of processing was the fastest of all the journals I have encountered.  The peer review and editorial comments were to-the-point and professional.  The open reader access greatly enhances article visibility.  I would publish again in this journal if I have suitable studies to publish.
Dr Sue Ming (New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email AlertsRSS Feeds
FacebookGoogle+Twitter
PinterestTumblrYouTube

SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results