Posted Mon, Nov, 12,2012
Dr Lucio Gnessi from Sapienza University of Rome, Italy writes about the experience publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports:
"My experience with Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports was excellent. The entire review process was fast and accurate. My previous experience with important top ranking journals was unpleasant mainly because the staff were slow and sometimes presumptuous. On the contrary, the editors of Libertas were helpful and prompt in responding to questions and issues related to the submission. I recommend the publisher to my colleagues."
Read Dr Gnessi's paper here, or click here to visit the Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports homepage
Posted in: Processing Speed and QualityTestimonials
News Categories
Thu 21 Feb, 2013
Authors Rate Editors in Chief and Associate EditorsThu 21 Feb, 2013
Global Consensus Theorem and Self-Organized CriticalityThu 21 Feb, 2013
Prefabricated Patient-Matched Cranial ImplantsI would like to say that this is the most author-friendly editing process I have experienced in over 50 publications. The publishing process of this journal was a most pleasant and productive experience. I was particularly impressed with the regular updates of the progress of my submission. My experience with Libertas Academica was excellent.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)
FacebookGoogle+Twitter
PinterestTumblrYouTube