Close
Help
Need Help?



Publish a Supplement in a Libertas Open Access Journal

Posted Mon, Oct, 29,2012

Following the substantial success of a recent supplement, which has been viewed more than 25,000 times since publication in January 2012, we announce our new supplement publication service.

Libertas journals offer a high-visibility desination for supplements, combined with rapid processing and high author satisfaction.  Each supplement has a dedicated project manager to ensure prompt high-quality publication.

Journals are extensively indexed and provide high quality blind peer review within just three weeks of submission.

Supplements are announced through our popular social media channels and many journals are indexed by Pubmed and/or Scopus.

All authors are offered free video abstract and author interview services if they wish, to further enhance the visibility of their article.

Supplements also offer significant article processing fee discounts.

To learn more and propose a supplement complete the supplement form or contact us.

share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
My submission to Libertas was one of the easiest and most time-efficient publication processes I have come across.  From the quick response of the reviewers to the rapid return of the proofs, I was amazed at how quickly my article was "publication ready"!  Thanks for such a painless publication process.
Dr Gerald W Dryden MD (University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email AlertsRSS Feeds
FacebookGoogle+Twitter
PinterestTumblrYouTube

SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results