Close
Help
Need Help?



Pubmed and Open Access Visibility in Evolutionary Bioinformatics

Posted Mon, Sep, 24,2012

Articles published in open access journals like Evolutionary Bioinformatics are more visible and likely to receive more citations than articles published in restricted access journals.

During August, Pubmed Central statistics showed that Libertas Academica has 1,468 papers available for anyone to download for free. These papers received 38,226 views, including 9,352 downloads. The most popular paper was viewed 776 times during the month. Including abstracts, figures, tables, supplementary data, and cited-in lists, Libertas material on the Pubmed Central website was viewed 48,224 times.

In addition to this, articles in Evolutionary Bioinformatics have now been viewed 591,011 times since 2008 through the Libertas website. This makes up part of the 8,426,702 total article views for all Libertas journals. Articles in Evolutionary Bioinformatics have also been downloaded more than 143,268 times since 2010. The total number of article downloads for all Libertas journals is 2,713,166.

Being an open access publisher means articles are freely available to everyone, thus increasing the level of visibility for articles published in Evolutionary Bioinformatics.

Visit the Evolutionary Bioinformatics homepage and view more statistics here

share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
The experience with the journal was excellent.  The submission process with simple, reviews were expedited quickly, and communication with the corresponding author was excellent.
Dr Andrew Briggs (Curtin University, Australia)
More Testimonials

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email AlertsRSS Feeds
FacebookGoogle+Twitter
PinterestTumblrYouTube

SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results