Close
Help
Need Help?



Cancer Informatics Unofficial Impact Factor Update

Posted Mon, Aug, 13,2012

The unofficial impact factor for Cancer Informatics was recently updated. It’s unofficial impact factor is 1.6406.

Unofficial impact factors are estimated based on the number of articles and citations in a journal, and are usually higher for serials which have been publishing for a longer time. For a journal only established in 2007, an unofficial impact factor this high is very impressive.

Cancer Informatics' respectable unofficial impact factor was made possible by the fact that it is open access, meaning all articles are available online for anyone to read and download for free.

The widely respected editorial board and high quality peer review process have also helped to increase the number of citations and article views for Cancer Informatics.

All articles published in Cancer Informatics will benefit from high readership and citation rates backed up by the journal’s high unofficial impact factor.

This achievement for such a new journal was made possible by the extensive visibility we have established for Cancer Informatics, indexing it in:

  • Pubmed

  • Chemical Abstracts Service

  • Chinese Electronic Periodical Service

  • Directory of Open Access Journals

  • EBSCO Academic Search Complete

  • EMBase

  • Gale Academic OneFile

  • Gale Health Reference Centre

  • Gale InfoTrac Custom Journals

  • Google Scholar

  • Illustrata-Natural Science

  • Index Copernicus

  • Intute

  • OAlster

  • ProQuest Biological Sciences

  • ProQuest Natural Sciences

  • ProQuest SciTech

  • ProQuest Technology

  • Pubget

  • Pubmed Central

  • SCOPUS

  • Socolar

Visit the Cancer Informatics homepage and view the Editor in Chief’s calls for papers

share on

Posted in: Impact Factors

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
This was the most efficient and user-friendly publishing process I have experienced.  The editorial team at Libertas Academica was phenomenal.  They kept me engaged with each step of the publishing process and they were timely and professional with their response to my inquiries.  I look forward to publishing additional articles with Libertas Academica in the future.
Dr Kevin Bain (PharmD, MPH, BCPS, CGP, CPH, FASCP, Philadelphia, PA, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email AlertsRSS Feeds
FacebookGoogle+Twitter
PinterestTumblrYouTube

SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results