Close
Help
Need Help?



Article Visibility in Libertas Open Access Journals

Posted Mon, Jul, 16,2012

Open access journals provide articles published in them with very high levels of visibility.  They compare very favorably against traditional controlled-access journals that restrict article availability to those  researchers who work at subscribing institutions or are able to afford pay-per-view fees.

A good example of the visibility our open access journals offer is "Relationship Between the Plasma Concentration of C-Reactive Protein and Severity of Peripheral Arterial Disease", published in Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology.  This article has achieved aproximately 14,000 views since publication.

This substantial visibility is also demonstrated by journals like Biomarker Insights and Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology, which have achieved more than 561,000 and 417,000 article views respectively.

To learn more about our journals visit the journals homepage to find your journals of interest.

share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
My experience publishing in Human Parasitic Diseases was very positive.  I was very satisfied with the rapid and high-quality review process and the constructive feedback.  The comments from the reviewers allowed me to improve the paper significantly.  I highly recommend that other researchers publish their papers in Libertas Academia Journals.
Dr. Pedro Magalhães (Faculty of Medicine, Agostinho Neto University, Luanda, Angola)
More Testimonials

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email AlertsRSS Feeds
FacebookGoogle+Twitter
PinterestTumblrYouTube

SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results