Posted Tue, Jun, 19,2012
Articles published in open access journals like Biomarker Insights have been shown to receive more citations than articles published in restricted access journals.
A recent review of the studies on open access citation advantage found that 87% of previous research showed open access articles to be more often cited than restricted access articles. An article’s citation level gives a good indication of its visibility and impact, and in some subject areas open access papers received 600% more citations than restricted access papers.
The mean difference in citations was 176.75% in favour of open access, meaning papers published in open access journal almost always get a considerable citation advantage over those published in restricted access journals.
During May, Pubmed Central statistics showed that Libertas Academica has 1,335 papers available for anyone to download for free. These papers received 34,251 views, including 9,058 downloads. The most popular paper was viewed 848 times during the month. Including abstracts, figures, tables, supplementary data, and cited-in lists, Libertas material on the Pubmed Central website was viewed 46,068 times.
Visit the Biomarker Insights homepage and view more statistics here
News Categories
Thu 21 Feb, 2013
Authors Rate Editors in Chief and Associate EditorsThu 21 Feb, 2013
Global Consensus Theorem and Self-Organized CriticalityThu 21 Feb, 2013
Prefabricated Patient-Matched Cranial ImplantsThe process of submitting the paper was smooth with little time required on the author's behalf. Reviews were prompt and the process of addressing reviewer comments was very streamlined. All correspondence with the editorial office was extremely professional with immediate responses. This is one of the few journals asking for feedback on their submission process.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)
FacebookGoogle+Twitter
PinterestTumblrYouTube