Close
Help
Need Help?



Most read paper in Japanese Clinical Medicine

Posted Thu, May, 03,2012

Japanese Clinical Medicine is an open access journal, meaning all articles are available for anyone to download freely without restriction. Open access journals are renowned for having high levels of article visibility compared to traditional subscription journals.

One good example of how open access journals can offer high visibility is 'Low-Grade Inflammation as Trade-Off Causing Chronic Complex Diseases', published in Japanese Clinical Medicine. This article has been viewed more than 2,508 times since its publication in 2010. This is the highest rate of viewing of all articles in Japanese Clinical Medicine and shows how publishing open access can increase article visibility and how publishing in Japanese Clinical Medicine can offer higher levels of visibility than restricted access alternatives.

Authors publishing in Japanese Clinical Medicine will benefit from the extensive indexing including many open access exclusive databases and directories that do not index subscription journals.

Visit the Japanese Clinical Medicine most read articles list

share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
My experience in publishing our manuscript in Environmental Health Insights was positive.  The speed of processing was the fastest of all the journals I have encountered.  The peer review and editorial comments were to-the-point and professional.  The open reader access greatly enhances article visibility.  I would publish again in this journal if I have suitable studies to publish.
Dr Sue Ming (New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email AlertsRSS Feeds
FacebookGoogle+Twitter
PinterestTumblrYouTube

SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results