Help
Editor in Chief: Timothy Kelley
Aims & Scope: Environmental Health Insights is a peer-reviewed, open-access online journal which looks at how env... more
Indexing & Databases: Pubmed, Chemical Abstracts Service, Chinese Electronic Periodical Service, Directory of Open Access Journals, EBSCO Environment Complete, Gale Academic OneFile, Gale Health Reference Centre, Gale InfoTrac Custom Journals, Gale Resource on the Environment, Energy, and Natural Resources, Illustrata-Natural Science, Illustrata-Technology, Index Copernicus, OAlster, ProQuest Engineering, ProQuest Environmental Sciences, ProQuest Natural Sciences, ProQuest SciTech, ProQuest Technology, Pubmed Central, Socolar
Journal Directories: Academic Journals Database, Cabell's Health Administration, EBSCO A-Z, HINARI, JournalSeek, JournalTOCs, OAJSE, Pubshub, RefSeek, SafetyLit, Scirus, Ulrich's Periodicals
Processing Speed: Blind peer review by minimum of two expert reviewers and independent editorial decision within three to four weeks. Publication within average four weeks following acceptance.
ISSN: 1178-6302
Signup for Email Alerts and keep in touch with Environmental Health Insights journal news, updates, events and articles
The Editor in Chief welcomes supplement proposals. Read more about what we offer and propose a supplement on the Supplements page.
My experience in publishing with Environmental Health Insights was positive from the beginning of the initial manuscript submittal, to the published product. The peer reviewers provided helpful suggestions, while the editorial and production staff kept me fully informed of the paper's process every step of the way. I recommend Libertas Academica for anyone that is serious about publishing their research in an efficient, friendly and professional manner.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2014 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube