Close
Help


78% of Authors Rate their Interactions with Editors in Chief as Very Good

Posted Tue, Jun, 10,2014

Survey.png

We survey all authors after their articles are published in our journals.  We ask them to rate various aspects of their experience to ensure that we're meeting our commitments to them.  

Our research shows that:

  • 78% of authors surveyed rated the quality of their interactions with editors in chiefs and associate editors as very good. 22% of authors rated the quality of their interactions as good.

  • 74% of authors surveyed rated the speed and efficiency of manuscript processing at Libertas as very good. 22% of authors rated the speed and efficiency of manuscript processing as good.

  • 74% of authors surveyed rated the quality of interactions with Libertas staff as very good. 22% of authors rated the quality of their interactions as good.

Let us know what you think

share on
  • Efficient Processing: 4 Weeks Average to First Editorial Decision
  • Fair & Independent Expert Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Database Coverage
Services for Authors
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
This is the second time I have submitted a paper to Palliative Care: Research and Treatment for possible publication.  In both instances, my experience with Libertas Academica was very good from submission to acceptance.  The peer reviewers' comments were insightful, very constructive, and extremely helpful.  The author interface was user-friendly.  The publishing process was fast and convenient. I highly recommend this journal.
Dr Liza Manalo (Palliative Care Unit, Cancer Center, The Medical City, Pasig City, Philippines)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube