Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Evolutionary Bioinformatics

749,487 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Impact of the Partitioning Scheme on Divergence Times Inferred from Mammalian Genomic Data Sets

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 14 May 2012

Type: Original Research

Journal: Evolutionary Bioinformatics

Citation: Evolutionary Bioinformatics 2012:8 207-218

doi: 10.4137/EBO.S9627

Abstract

Data partitioning has long been regarded as an important parameter for phylogenetic inference. The division of heterogeneous multigene data sets into partitions with similar substitution patterns is known to increase the performance of probabilistic phylogenetic methods. However, the effect of the partitioning scheme on divergence time estimates has generally been ignored. To investigate the impact of data partitioning on the estimation of divergence times, we have constructed two genomic data sets. The first one with 15 nuclear genes comprising 50,928 bp were selected from the OrthoMam database; the second set was composed of complete mitochondrial genomes. We studied two partitioning schemes: concatenated supermatrices and partitioned gene analysis. We have also measured the impact of taxonomic sampling on the estimates. After drawing divergence time inferences using the uncorrelated relaxed clock in BEAST, we have compared the age estimates between the partitioning schemes. Our results show that, in general, both schemes resulted in similar chronological estimates, however the concatenated data sets were more efficient than the partitioned ones in attaining suitable effective sample sizes.


Downloads

PDF  (2.51 MB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing


Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Evolutionary Bioinformatics
This is the fastest progress we have experienced from submission to acceptance.  Reviews are fast, pertinent, and instructive.  Every step of the process is visible and prompt, and every email is friendly and immediate.  In all, it is an excellent experience to be published in Libertas Academica.
Dr Jiang Wang (Sun Yat sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results