Close
Help
Need Help?



Entitlement to Sickness Benefits in Sweden: The Social Insurance Officers Experiences

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 20 Jun 2008

Journal: Environmental Health Insights

Citation: Environmental Health Insights 2008:2 13-23

Elsy Söderberg and Ulrika Müssener

Division of Social Medicine and Public Health Science, Department of Health and Society, Linköping University, S-581 85 Linköping, Sweden. Division of Community Medicine, Department of Medical and Health Science, Linköping University, S-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.

Abstract

Background:  Social insurance offices (SIOs) handle a wide range of complex assessments of the entitlement to sickness benefits for an increasing number of clients on sick leave and consequently, the demands on the SIOs have increased considerably.

Aim:  To gain deeper knowledge of the problems experienced by the SIOs in their work associated with entitlement to sickness benefits.

Method:  A descriptive and explorative qualitative approach was used to analyse data from two focus-group interviews, including six participants in each group.

Results:  The participants discussed different dilemmas in regard to; physicians’ responsibility for issuing sickness certificates, interactions with the insured individuals, disclosure of decisions, communications with medical consultants, documentation of sickness benefit claims, threats in the workplace, as well as their own competence. The SIOs regarded incomplete information on sickness certificates as a main problem, because they frequently had to contact the client and the physicians who issued the certificates in order to obtain further details, leading to delays in the decision-making whether to grant sickness benefits.

Conclusions:  More knowledge regarding SIOs work is required to improve the methods used in the sickness insurance system and to ensure adequate training of new staff members.


Downloads

PDF  (245.31 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Environmental Health Insights
As a peer reviewer for Environmental Health Insights, I have had the opportunity to read several very important research articles in my field.  Based on my experience, the submission process, review standards, and publication expectations are rigorous and demanding as other high impact journals.  I look forward to further reviewing papers for Environmental Health Insights and learning from my peers and other leaders in the field.
Dr Jianbo Jiang (Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA )
More Testimonials

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email AlertsRSS Feeds
FacebookGoogle+Twitter
PinterestTumblrYouTube

SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results