Close
Help
signup_email_alerts
Need Help?



Cost-Effective Cloud Computing: A Case Study Using the Comparative Genomics Tool, Roundup

Submit a Paper


Libertas Analytics


3926 Article Views

Publication Date: 22 Dec 2010

Type: Short Report

Journal: Evolutionary Bioinformatics

Citation: Evolutionary Bioinformatics 2010:6 197-203

doi: 10.4137/EBO.S6259

EB journal

566,667 Article Views

8,005,442 Libertas Article Views

More Statistics

Abstract

Background: Comparative genomics resources, such as ortholog detection tools and repositories are rapidly increasing in scale and complexity. Cloud computing is an emerging technological paradigm that enables researchers to dynamically build a dedicated virtual cluster and may represent a valuable alternative for large computational tools in bioinformatics. In the present manuscript, we optimize the computation of a large-scale comparative genomics resource—Roundup—using cloud computing, describe the proper operating principles required to achieve computational efficiency on the cloud, and detail important procedures for improving cost-effectiveness to ensure maximal computation at minimal costs.

Methods: Utilizing the comparative genomics tool, Roundup, as a case study, we computed orthologs among 902 fully sequenced genomes on Amazon’s Elastic Compute Cloud. For managing the ortholog processes, we designed a strategy to deploy the web service, Elastic MapReduce, and maximize the use of the cloud while simultaneously minimizing costs. Specifically, we created a model to estimate cloud runtime based on the size and complexity of the genomes being compared that determines in advance the optimal order of the jobs to be submitted.

Results: We computed orthologous relationships for 245,323 genome-to-genome comparisons on Amazon’s computing cloud, a computation that required just over 200 hours and cost $8,000 USD, at least 40% less than expected under a strategy in which genome comparisons were submitted to the cloud randomly with respect to runtime. Our cost savings projections were based on a model that not only demonstrates the optimal strategy for deploying RSD to the cloud, but also finds the optimal cluster size to minimize waste and maximize usage. Our cost-reduction model is readily adaptable for other comparative genomics tools and potentially of significant benefit to labs seeking to take advantage of the cloud as an alternative to local computing infrastructure.


Post a Comment

x close

Discussion Add A Comment

Posted by Mark Christopher West - 13:38,July 20, 2012

There are already tools to measure the ROI of cloud infrastructure - check out http://costeffectivecloud.com


share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (Less Than 3 Weeks)
  • Fair & Comprehensive Peer Review
  • Professional Author Service
  • Leading Editors in Chief
  • Extensive Indexing
  • High Readership & Impact
  • What Your Colleagues Say

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email AlertsRSS Feeds
FacebookGoogle+Twitter
PinterestTumblrYouTube

BROWSE CATEGORIES
Our Testimonials
We have had a great experience publishing our paper in Nutrition & Metabolic Insights.  The peer review process was rigorous and the journal staff were very helpful with proof processing.  We will definitely be submitting future manuscripts to this journal.  Keep up the good work!!
Dr Sukhinder Kaur Cheema (Memorial University, St John's, Newfoundland, Canada) What Your Colleagues Say