Close
Help
Need Help?



Assessment of Confounding Factors Affecting the Tumor Markers SMRP, CA125, and CYFRA21-1 in Serum

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 28 Jan 2010

Type: Original Research

Journal: Biomarker Insights

Citation: Biomarker Insights 2010:5 1-8

doi: 10.4137/BMI.S3927

Abstract

The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate if serum levels of potential tumor markers for the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma and lung cancer are affected by confounding factors in a surveillance cohort of workers formerly exposed to asbestos. SMRP, CA125, and CYFRA21-1 concentrations were determined in about 1,700 serum samples from 627 workers formerly exposed to asbestos. The impact of factors that could modify the concentrations of the tumor markers was examined with linear mixed models. SMRP values increased with age 1.02-fold (95% CI 1.01–1.03) and serum creatinine concentration 1.32-fold (95% CI 1.20–1.45). Levels differed by study centers and were higher after 40 years of asbestos exposure. CA125 levels increased with longer storage of the samples. CYFRA21-1 values correlated with age 1.02-fold (95% CI 1.01–1.02), serum creatinine 1.21-fold (95% CI 1.14–1.30) and varied by study centers due to differences in sample handling. Tumor marker concentrations are influenced by subject-related factors, sample handling, and storage. These factors need to be taken into account in screening routine.


Downloads

PDF  (528.81 KB PDF format)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (Less Than 3 Weeks)
  • Fair & Comprehensive Peer Review
  • Professional Author Service
  • Leading Editors in Chief
  • Extensive Indexing
  • High Readership & Impact
  • What Your Colleagues Say

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email AlertsRSS Feeds
FacebookGoogle+Twitter
PinterestTumblrYouTube

SUBJECT HUBS
Our Testimonials
Publishing in Air, Soil and Water and Water Research was the best experience I have had so far in an academic context.  The review process was fair, quick and efficient.  I congratulate the team at Libertas Academica for a very well managed journal.
Magnus Karlsson (IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Stockholm, Sweden) What Your Colleagues Say