Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Advances in Tumor Virology

31,137 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics


Is this journal right for my paper?

Ask Editor in Chief
Submit a Paper

Editor in Chief: Frank J. Jenkins

Aims & Scope: Advances in Tumor Virology is an open access, peer reviewed journal which covers all research into ... more

Indexing & Databases: Chinese Electronic Periodical Service, EBSCO CINAHL Complete, Gale Academic OneFile, Gale Health Reference Centre, Gale InfoTrac Custom Journals, Index Copernicus, ProQuest Health & Medical Complete, Socolar

Journal Directories: Academic Journals Database, EBSCO A-Z, JournalSeek, JournalTOCs, OAJSE, Scirus, Ulrich's Periodicals

Processing Speed: Editorial decision less than 3 weeks, publication in average 3 weeks after acceptance

ISSN: 1179-5654



Signup for Email Alerts and keep in touch with Advances in Tumor Virology journal news, updates, events and articles

Article Search

Items per page:


Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to First Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Advances in Tumor Virology
I was delighted to submit an invited review on cluster headache pharmacology.  As someone who writes a few papers per year on these subjects, I appreciated that the submission, review and approval process for the paper was smooth and efficient. Our reviewers raised important points that improved the overall quality of the manuscript. Overall a very positive experience.
Dr Michael J. Marmura (Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results