Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Environmental Health Insights

391,850 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Women, Environments and Chronic Disease: Shifting the Gaze from Individual Level to Structural Factors

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 23 Jan 2009

Journal: Environmental Health Insights

Citation: Environmental Health Insights 2008:2 127-135

Natalie Hemsing1 and Lorraine Greaves2

1Tobacco Research Coordinator, British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 2Executive Director, British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic heart and respiratory diseases are two of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality affecting women. Patterns of and disparities in chronic diseases between sub-populations of women suggest that there are social as well as individual level factors which enhance or impede the prevention or development of chronic respiratory and cardio- vascular diseases. By examining the sex, gender and diversity based dimensions of women’s lung and heart health and how these overlap with environmental factors we extend analysis of preventive health beyond the individual level. We demon- strate how biological, environmental and social factors interact and operate in women’s lives, structuring their opportunities for health and abilities to prevent or manage chronic cardiovascular and respiratory diseases.

Methods: This commentary is based on the findings from two evidence reviews, one conducted on women’s heart health, and another on women’s lung health. Additional literature was also reviewed which assessed the relationship between environmental factors and chronic heart and lung diseases. This paper explores how obesogenic environments, exposure to tobacco smoke, and the experience of living in deprived areas can affect women’s heart and respiratory health. We discuss the barriers which impede women’s ability to engage in physical activity, consume healthy foods, or avoid smoking, tobacco smoke, and other airborne contaminants.

Results: Sex, gender and diversity clearly interact with environmental factors and shape women’s promotion of health and prevention of chronic respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. The environments women live in structure their opportunities for health, and women navigate these environments in unique ways based on gender, socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity and other social factors.

Discussion: Future research, policy and programs relating to the prevention of chronic disease need to move beyond linear individually-oriented models and address these complexities by developing frameworks and interventions which improve environmental conditions for all groups of women. Indeed, in order to improve women’s health, broad social and economic policies and initiatives are required to eliminate negative environmental impacts on women’s opportunities for health.


Downloads

PDF  (211.69 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing




What Your Colleagues Say About Environmental Health Insights
My experience in publishing our manuscript in Environmental Health Insights was positive.  The speed of processing was the fastest of all the journals I have encountered.  The peer review and editorial comments were to-the-point and professional.  The open reader access greatly enhances article visibility.  I would publish again in this journal if I have suitable studies to publish.
Dr Sue Ming (New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results