Close
Help




JOURNAL

Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research

Why, After Chemotherapy, is it Necessary to Assess Memory Using Translational Testing?

Submit a Paper


Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research 2012:6 181-190

Review

Published on 19 Nov 2012

DOI: 10.4137/BCBCR.S10293


Further metadata provided in PDF



Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research

Abstract

As the number of cancer survivors rises, so does the importance of understanding what happens post-chemotherapy. The evidence is clear that chemotherapy affects not only cancer cells, but also healthy cells including neurons, leading to long-term cognitive dysfunction in a large portion of survivors. In order to understand the mechanism of action and in the hope of reducing the potential neurocognitive side effects of chemotherapy, pre-clinical testing should be used more effectively. However, the field is lacking translation from clinical studies to animal models. Spatial learning and memory paradigms based on the water maze, the most commonly used rodent model, are available for translational testing in humans and could overcome this weakness. There is an overwhelming need in the field to understand whether the water maze is an adequate model for post-chemotherapy impairments or whether other paradigms should be used. This is of great importance for the understanding of the mechanisms, side effects of new drugs, appropriate pharmacotherapy, and confounding factors related to chemotherapy treatment regiments. This review is very important to both basic scientists and clinicians determining how translational paradigms are critical to future cancer research, as well as what type of paradigms are appropriate in our technically advancing society.



Downloads

PDF  (853.13 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

Supplementary Files 1  (32.45 MB M4V FORMAT)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Video Abstract

Sharing


What Your Colleagues Say About Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research
I had a great experience publishing our paper in Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research. The editorial team is very friendly and helpful. I was updated frequently during the entire review and publishing process. The review process is very reasonable and fair. The editor in charge has good judgement on review comments. I would recommend this journal to any researchers who conduct breast cancer research.
Dr Yanfen Hu (University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube