Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology

396,741 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Safety and Efficacy of Apixaban in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 11 Jul 2012

Type: Review

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology

Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology 2012:6 103-109

doi: 10.4137/CMC.S8204

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia that increases the risk of stroke and systemic embolism. Warfarin is a highly effective treatment in reducing this risk, but a narrow therapeutic range, drug and food interactions, required monitoring, and bleeding limit its use. We review Apixaban, an oral inhibitor of Factor Xa, which has been shown in large randomized trials to have superior efficacy in stroke reduction without an excess in bleeding events when compared with aspirin in those deemed unsuitable to receive warfarin, and demonstrates superior efficacy in reducing stroke and systemic embolism in addition to a reduction in bleeding events when compared to warfarin.


Downloads

PDF  (481.10 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing




What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology
Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology is very much conscious of time. Every step is done thoroughly and rapidly.  The reviewers' comments are constructive. There is regular contact with the authors, providing explanations where necessary.  The visibility also enjoyed by one's article once it is published is worthy of note.  Thanks for making publishing with you so easy and enjoyable.
Dr Pat Akinwusi (Osun State University and Ladoke Akintola University Teaching Hospital, Osogbo, Nigeria)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results