Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology

459,705 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Rosuvastatin: A Review of the Pharmacology and Clinical Effectiveness in Cardiovascular Disease

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 01 Feb 2012

Type: Review

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology

Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology 2012:6 17-33

doi: 10.4137/CMC.S4324

Abstract

Rosuvastatin is a new generation HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor which exhibits some unique pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties. It has low extrahepatic tissue penetration, low potential for CYP3A4 interactions and substantial LDL-C lowering capacity and therefore has distinct advantages. We conducted a Medline literature search to identify rosuvastatin papers published in English. In this review, we outline the pharmacology of rosuvastatin, highlighting its efficacy and safety. We also review the major clinical trials with reference to primary and secondary prevention, familial hypercholesterolaemia and comparison with other statins. Finally we address its place in clinical practice.


Downloads

PDF  (590.16 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing




What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology
The review process in Libertas Academica journals is prompt, objective and rigorous.  The entire process is smooth and clear and all the editorial staff are cooperative and professional.  Published papers are of top clinical and scientific value, and high metrics reflect the excellent quality of Libertas Academica's journals.
Dr Antoine Kossaify (USEK NDS University Hospital, Byblos, Lebanon)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results