Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Dermatology

143,683 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Romidepsin for Relapsed and Refractory Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 13 Aug 2012

Type: Review

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Dermatology

Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Dermatology 2012:5 21-28

doi: 10.4137/CMD.S7252

Abstract

Romidepsin is a histone deacetylase inhibitor recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. It has led to protracted responses in a significant subset of patients and provides a new treatment option for those refractory to first and second line systemic treatments. Given intravenously, its main toxicities are gastrointestinal as well as haematological. This review discusses the mechanism of action of romidepsin in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and the clinical trials which provide the basis for FDA approval. We conclude by discussing practical aspects of its administration and give our opinion on how it should be incorporated into the therapeutic armamentarium for patients with refractory CTCL.


Downloads

PDF  (938.85 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)


Sharing




What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Dermatology
I highly recommend publication in Libertas Academia journals. The entire submission, review and publication process for our article in Clinical Medicine Insights: Dermatology was easy and quick.  The reviews were very professional and helpful and the publication fees were reasonable.  We also appreciate that our article is available online free of charge to anyone interested in it.
Dr Lisa Roche (New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services, Trenton, NJ, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results