Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Dermatology

143,686 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Real Word Acne Therapy in Primary Care

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 05 Nov 2012

Type: Review

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Dermatology

Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Dermatology 2012:5 29-43

doi: 10.4137/CMD.S8340

Abstract

Acne vulgaris is a common presenting complaint to the family physician. With its multitude of treatment options and varying degrees of presentation severity, the management of acne vulgaris in the primary health care setting can be overwhelming. This review provides a framework for primary care physicians for the management of acne vulgaris. It presents information regarding the basic mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic profile, safety, efficacy, patient preference and role in therapy for the major modalities of acne treatment relevant to primary care.


Downloads

PDF  (506.48 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)


Sharing




What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Dermatology
I highly recommend publication in Libertas Academia journals. The entire submission, review and publication process for our article in Clinical Medicine Insights: Dermatology was easy and quick.  The reviews were very professional and helpful and the publication fees were reasonable.  We also appreciate that our article is available online free of charge to anyone interested in it.
Dr Lisa Roche (New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services, Trenton, NJ, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results