Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology

460,367 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead in a Patient with CRT-D Does Not Overcome Phrenic Nerve Stimulation

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 27 Apr 2011

Type: Case report

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology

Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology 2011:5 45-47

doi: 10.4137/CMC.S6759

Abstract

Effective cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) requires an accurate atrio-biventricular pacing system. The innovative Quartet lead is a quadripolar, over-the-wire left ventricular lead with four electrodes and has recently been designed to provide more options and greater control in pacing vector selection. A lead with multiple pacing electrodes is a potential alternative to physical adjustment of the lead and may help to overcome high thresholds and phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS).


Downloads

PDF  (668.53 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing




What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology
Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology is very much conscious of time. Every step is done thoroughly and rapidly.  The reviewers' comments are constructive. There is regular contact with the authors, providing explanations where necessary.  The visibility also enjoyed by one's article once it is published is worthy of note.  Thanks for making publishing with you so easy and enjoyable.
Dr Pat Akinwusi (Osun State University and Ladoke Akintola University Teaching Hospital, Osogbo, Nigeria)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results