Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology

611,599 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Predictors of Success in Ablation of Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 07 May 2013

Type: Original Research

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology

Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology 2013:7 87-95

doi: 10.4137/CMC.S11501

Abstract

During ablation of re-entrant ventricular tachycardia (VT) 3-dimensional mapping systems are now used to properly delineate the scar tissue and aid ablation of scar-related VT. The aim of our study was to outline how the mode of ablation predicts success and recurrence in large scar-related VT. When comparing patients with recurrence and patients with no recurrence, univariate analysis showed that number of ablation lesions (28 ± 8 vs. 12 ± 8, P = 0.01) and more linear ablation lesions rather than focal lesions (P = 0.03) were associated with long-term success. We demonstrated that more extensive ablation lesions and creation of linear lesions is associated with better success rate and lower recurrence rate during ablation of large scar-related ventricular tachycardia.


Downloads

PDF  (2.15 MB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing




What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology
The review process in Libertas Academica journals is prompt, objective and rigorous.  The entire process is smooth and clear and all the editorial staff are cooperative and professional.  Published papers are of top clinical and scientific value, and high metrics reflect the excellent quality of Libertas Academica's journals.
Dr Antoine Kossaify (USEK NDS University Hospital, Byblos, Lebanon)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results