Close
Help
Need Help?



Photodynamic Diagnosis For Superficial Bladder Cancer: do All Risk-Groups Profit Equally From Oncological and Economic Long-Term Results?

Submit a Paper


Libertas Analytics


1518 Article Views

Publication Date: 30 Apr 2009

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology

Citation: Clinical Medicine: Oncology 2009:3 53-58

CMIonc
journal

192,533 Article Views

3,597,280 Libertas Article Views

More Statistics

AbstractObjective: Photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) of superficial bladder cancer decreases recurrence rates. We present oncological results of a randomized, prospective study, comparing transurethral resection (TUR) performed under conventional white light (WL) with PDD. The follow-up period is the longest reported to date. As costs might be reimbursed by prolonged recurrence-free survival in certain patients cost analysis in regard to risk-groups was performed. Material and methods: Using chi-square test and log-rank test we compared recurrence rates of 103 patients after WL-TUR and of 88 patients after PDD-TUR. Cost analysis was performed according to risk-groups of recurrence. Results: Mean follow-up was 99 months. Recurrence rate was 57% in WL vs. 28% in PDD (p 0.001). Costs incurred by subsequent TUR averaged € 2310 per WL patient vs. € 713 per PDD patient. Savings per patient by PDD amounted to € 1597. PDD costs were reimbursed in low, intermediate and high risk patients, respectively. Conclusions: PDD-TUR is significantly superior to conventional WL-TUR in terms of recurrence rate. While economic benefit is most prominent in intermediate risk patients, PDD related costs are reimbursed in all risk-groups.


Post a Comment

x close

Discussion Add A Comment
No comments yet...Be the first to comment.


share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (Average 3 Weeks)
  • Fair & Constructive Peer Review
  • Professional Author Service
  • High Visibility
  • High Readership
  • What Our Authors Say

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers. RSS Feeds Email Alerts Twitter

BROWSE CATEGORIES
Our Testimonials
It is a great pleasure for me to be a peer reviewer for Libertas Academica.  The review process is efficient, well organized, and user friendly.  I encourage others to be a part of this team as an author or a peer reviewer/editor.  Thanks Libertas Academica editors and editorial management for maintaining this high level of quality and for their professionalism.
Dr Mahmud Hossain (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, Washington, USA) What our authors say