Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Environmental Health Insights

391,872 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Memory Functions in Recreational Pistol Sport Shooters: Does Lead Matter?

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 03 Apr 2009

Journal: Environmental Health Insights

Citation: Environmental Health Insights 2009:3 13-18

Sanna Asa-Mäkitaipale1,2, Mervi Jehkonen3, Jukka Uitti4,5 and Juhani Vilkki2

1South Karelian Central Hospital, Department of Neurology, Lappeenranta, Finland. 2University of Helsinki, Department of Psychology, Helsinki, Finland. 3University of Tampere, Department of Psychology, Tampere, Finland. 4Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Tampere, Finland. 5Clinic of Occupational Medicine, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of our study was to examine the memory functions of pistol sport shooters using powder charges when exposure to lead is expected to be considerably lower than in occupational circumstances.

Methods:  A neuropsychological battery of memory and intelligence tests was administered to 20 sport shooters and 20 controls whose mean ages (SDs) were 55 (9.6) and 54 (9.3) years respectively. Memory functions were evaluated with three subtests of the Wechsler Memory Scale - Revised (WMS-R) and an incidental memory test. Intelligence was assessed with four subtests of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Revised (WAIS-R). The level of alcohol consumption and depression were examined in both groups. Blood lead level was determined among the shooters.

Results:  The shooters performed worse than the controls in the tests of incidental and logical memory. The groups did not differ in intelligence, mood or alcohol consumption. The mean (SD) blood lead level of the sport shooters was 0.52 μmol/L (0.40), responding 10.76 μg/dl (8.28).

Conclusions:  Low lead exposure in recreational shooting conditions may impair verbal memory. Therefore it is important to ensure that lead exposure is prevented among those shooting for sport.


Downloads

PDF  (216.15 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing




What Your Colleagues Say About Environmental Health Insights
My experience in publishing our manuscript in Environmental Health Insights was positive.  The speed of processing was the fastest of all the journals I have encountered.  The peer review and editorial comments were to-the-point and professional.  The open reader access greatly enhances article visibility.  I would publish again in this journal if I have suitable studies to publish.
Dr Sue Ming (New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results