Publication Date: 03 Apr 2009
Journal: Environmental Health Insights
Citation: Environmental Health Insights 2009:3 13-18
Sanna Asa-Mäkitaipale1,2, Mervi Jehkonen3, Jukka Uitti4,5 and Juhani Vilkki2
1South Karelian Central Hospital, Department of Neurology, Lappeenranta, Finland. 2University of Helsinki, Department of Psychology, Helsinki, Finland. 3University of Tampere, Department of Psychology, Tampere, Finland. 4Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Tampere, Finland. 5Clinic of Occupational Medicine, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of our study was to examine the memory functions of pistol sport shooters using powder charges when exposure to lead is expected to be considerably lower than in occupational circumstances.
Methods: A neuropsychological battery of memory and intelligence tests was administered to 20 sport shooters and 20 controls whose mean ages (SDs) were 55 (9.6) and 54 (9.3) years respectively. Memory functions were evaluated with three subtests of the Wechsler Memory Scale - Revised (WMS-R) and an incidental memory test. Intelligence was assessed with four subtests of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Revised (WAIS-R). The level of alcohol consumption and depression were examined in both groups. Blood lead level was determined among the shooters.
Results: The shooters performed worse than the controls in the tests of incidental and logical memory. The groups did not differ in intelligence, mood or alcohol consumption. The mean (SD) blood lead level of the sport shooters was 0.52 μmol/L (0.40), responding 10.76 μg/dl (8.28).
Conclusions: Low lead exposure in recreational shooting conditions may impair verbal memory. Therefore it is important to ensure that lead exposure is prevented among those shooting for sport.
PDF (216.15 KB PDF FORMAT)
RIS citation (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)
BibTex citation (BIBDESK, LATEX)
PMC HTML
My experience in publishing our manuscript in Environmental Health Insights was positive. The speed of processing was the fastest of all the journals I have encountered. The peer review and editorial comments were to-the-point and professional. The open reader access greatly enhances article visibility. I would publish again in this journal if I have suitable studies to publish.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2014 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube