Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics

928,400 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Management of Transfusional Chronic Iron Overload: Focus on Deferasirox

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 09 Jul 2009

Type: Review

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics

Citation: Clinical Medicine: Therapeutics 2009:1 735-745

Abstract

Most patients with hereditary or chronic acquired anemias are dependent on regular red cell transfusions. Untreated iron overload from transfusions is responsible for morbidity and mortality in patients with thalassemia major. However, clinical consequences of parenchymal iron overload have been reported not only in thalassemia major but also in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. The current standard in iron chelation therapy is deferoxamine mesylate (Desferal®). Deferasirox is the first oral iron chelator approved in the Europe Union for use in patients with transfusional iron overload with different diseases. The aim of this review is to examine the properties and management of Deferasirox.


Downloads

PDF  (2.36 MB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)


Sharing




What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics
I would like to express my gratitude and say that publishing in LA's journals is one of the best experiences I have had.  I will certainly continue with LA's journals in the future.  the unique feature of this publisher is that it provides a research platform for all young researchers.  Thank you for providing a sustainable publishing environment for us.
Dr Syed Wasif Gillani (Lecturer and Researcher, Discipline of Clinical Pharmacy, USM, Malaysia)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results