Close
Help
Need Help?



Thank You for Reading

Posted Tue, Dec, 31,2013

We would like to take this opportunity to thank all of our authors and editorial contributors as well as anyone who has read, cited, blogged or tweeted our articles. Without you our journals wouldn’t be where they are today.

In 2013 the top 5 publishing journals were:

  • Evolutionary Bioinformatics: 36
  • Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports: 33
  • Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology: 28
  • Bioinformatics and Biology Insights: 24
  • Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment: 19

We are constantly striving to maintain the high quality of service we offer to our authors and readers, and are always interested to receive further suggestions or comments that will help us to improve our journals and services. Feel free to contact us if you have some feedback to share with us.

share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
As a new contributor, my experience publishing our article in Genetics and Epigenetics was extremely positive.  The reviewing process was prompt and fair (four reviewers examined our review article!) and then, the editorial office was very helpful by regularly updating me on the progression of the publication process.  I strongly recommend the journal to my colleagues in the field and hope that the journal will grow up and gain the notoriety it deserves in our ...
Dr Sylviane Muller (Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS, Strasbourg, France)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results