Close
Help
signup_email_alerts
Need Help?



Knowledge of “Heart Attack” Symptoms in a Canadian Urban Community

Submit a Paper


Libertas Analytics


4372 Article Views

Publication Date: 21 May 2008

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology

Citation: Clinical Medicine: Cardiology 2008:2 201-213

CMIcar journal

197,914 Article Views

6,115,307 Libertas Article Views

More Statistics

Abstract

Background: Temporal delays in myocardial infarction (MI) treatment have been addressed through patient and physician education, innovations in prehospital fibrinolysis, and improvements to emergency medical services, yet the most significant contributor to delayed treatment is the patient’s ability to recognize and respond to symptoms.

Purpose: To determine whether public health education campaigns have achieved their desired reach by ensuring that all segments of the population recognize the symptoms of MI (“heart attack”).

Methods: 976 men and women, 40+ years of age, randomly selected from Metro Vancouver, Canada completed a telephone survey in English, Punjabi, Mandarin, or Cantonese. Respondents’ knowledge of MI symptoms was assessed; 10 “correct symptoms” were considered to be: chest pain/pressure/tightness/discomfort, arm pain, shortness of breath, nausea/indigestion, sweating/clamminess, shoulder/back pain, dizziness/faintness/light headedness, jaw pain, weakness, and uneasiness/panic/anxiety.

Results: 3.2% of the sample could not identify any correct symptoms and 53.3% were able to describe 3+ symptoms. Significant associations were found between the number of correct symptoms and gender, ethnicity, education, exposure to health professional counseling, and worry about having a heart attack. The least number of correct symptoms were reported by: men (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.87; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.81−0.95), Chinese-Canadian participants (IRR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.65−0.83; relative to European-Canadian born participants), those with less than high school education (IRR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.66−0.92; relative to those with more than high school), those with no health professional counseling (IRR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.84−1.00), and those who did not worry “at all” about having a heart attack (IRR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.80−0.98; relative to those who worried sometimes/often/almost all the time).

Conclusions: The participants were not well informed about the symptoms of heart attack. It will be challenging to educate the public sufficiently to reduce the time between the onset of symptoms and initiation of treatment for MI.


Post a Comment

x close

Discussion Add A Comment
No comments yet...Be the first to comment.


share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (Less Than 3 Weeks)
  • Fair & Comprehensive Peer Review
  • Professional Author Service
  • Leading Editors in Chief
  • Extensive Indexing
  • High Readership & Impact
  • What Our Authors Say

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers. RSS Feeds Email Alerts Twitter

BROWSE CATEGORIES
Our Testimonials
It is indeed a great pleasure for me to associate both as a reviewer and as an author for LA Journals.  LA is an upcoming open access publisher with many online journals.  The operating systems are user friendly; they are very efficient in processing manuscripts with excitingly alert staff.  I strongly recommend LA for authors.
Dr Medicharla V Jagannadham (Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, India) What our authors say