Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research 2013:7 51-57
Original Research
Published on 12 Jun 2013
DOI: 10.4137/BCBCR.S12214
Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research
Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among Egyptian women. The disease is often advanced at diagnosis. Since molecular profiling is not feasible in routine practice, we sought to examine the association of age distribution with hormone receptor profile, disease stage and outcome among Egyptian women.
Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective review of breast cancer patients treated at Mansoura University Cancer Center in the Nile Delta from 2006 through 2011. Age groups were examined in relation to hormone receptors status and tumor clinicopathological criteria. Additionally, the effect of receptor status on disease relapse and disease-free survival was examined with logistic regression and Kaplan–Meier analysis.
Results: A total of 263 patients were included in the current analysis. About 66.9% (n = 176) of patients were hormone receptor positive, 14.1% (n = 37) were Her2/neu positive, and 19.0% (n = 50) were triple negative. Median age of the patients was 52 years and was equal across all receptor status types. Triple negative status correlated with increased risk of disease relapse (odds ratio = 1.8, P = 0.03) and with shortened disease-free survival (hazards ratio = 2.6, P < 0.01).
Conclusion: The age distribution and receptor status pattern in the Nile Delta region does not explain the aggressive behavior of the disease. The age of the patients at diagnosis is older than patients in earlier studies from Egypt emphasizing the importance of implementing mammographic screening programs.
PDF (898.58 KB PDF FORMAT)
RIS citation (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)
BibTex citation (BIBDESK, LATEX)
PMC HTML
I had a great experience publishing our paper in Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research. The editorial team is very friendly and helpful. I was updated frequently during the entire review and publishing process. The review process is very reasonable and fair. The editor in charge has good judgement on review comments. I would recommend this journal to any researchers who conduct breast cancer research.
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube