Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Evolutionary Bioinformatics

1,175,747 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

FORS-D Analysis in P. falciparum can Differentiate Classes of Genes Under Selection

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 20 Mar 2011

Type: Original Research

Journal: Evolutionary Bioinformatics

Citation: Evolutionary Bioinformatics 2011:7 21-29

doi: 10.4137/EBO.S6609

Abstract

FORS-D is a measure of the contribution of base order to the stem loop potential of a nucleic acid sequence and can also give information on evolutionary pressures on sequences to move away from secondary structure. Negative FORS-D values in a gene are associated with exons and nucleotide substitutions such as SNPs. An analysis of P. falciparum genes under selection pressure shows a correlation between negative FORS-D values and SNP density for genes that drug targets but not for drug transporters or antigenic variation genes. Analysis of the dhfr gene shows that a majority of rare mutations that associate with drug resistance also fall into regions with negative FORS-D values. These data suggest that FORS-D values might be predictors for drug target genes and drug resistance mutations in these genes.


Downloads

PDF  (551.39 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing




What Your Colleagues Say About Evolutionary Bioinformatics
I must say publishing with Evolutionary Bioinformatics was a great and partially unexpected experience.  It allowed me to understand the name 'Libertas Academica' is not just a name but a real issue.  The reviewers offered us stringent, rigorous but totally unprejudiced comments, the editor supported us and the paper visibility was very good.  Thank you again.
Dr Alessandro Giuliani (Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Roma, Italy)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results