Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development 2014:1 5-8
Opinion
Published on 25 Aug 2014
DOI: 10.4137/JMECD.S17495
Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
There is currently no universally accepted core collection of competencies or medical education material for medical students. Individual medical schools create their own competencies and set of educational material using a variety of approaches.
What has resulted is a medical education system wherein medical students are trained without any burden of proof that they are indeed competent in agreed upon areas of knowledge, skills, attitudes and behaviors befit of a graduating medical student.
In fact, the only uniform assurance a member of the public in the United States can have for a graduating allopathic medical student is that the student has successfully passed USMLE Step 1 and 2 by correctly answering a rumored 55–65% of questions correctly (yes, that is an F) and that they have maintained at least a “C” average or “Pass” equivalent in all of their medical school courses.
This article discusses these inadequacies within the current medical education system, and the need to standardize the competencies and curricula for all medical schools through a narrative disclosing this author’s experience with trying to initiate such a movement at his own medical school.
PDF (711.36 KB PDF FORMAT)
RIS citation (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)
BibTex citation (BIBDESK, LATEX)
Working with the Editor at the Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, and the publishing staff at Libertas Academica was an excellent experience. From submission to revision, the editorial process was smooth and fair. I had such a good experience that I will consider journals of Libertas Academica at the top of my list the next time I want to submit a manuscript.
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube