Close
Help




JOURNAL

Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development

Exposure to ACGME Core Competencies Through Mentored Basic Science Research: A Pilot Analysis

Submit a Paper


Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development 2014:1 29-39

Opinion

Published on 02 Dec 2014

DOI: 10.4137/JMECD.S17498


Further metadata provided in PDF



Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development

Abstract

Since 1998, the Short-Term Training Program (STTP) at the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles has nearly tripled (from 30 to 89) in the number of first-year undergraduate medical students participants. STTP supports mentored research projects in the areas of basic sciences, clinical sciences, medical education, and public health (local and international). Although projects can be very specific in scope, the overall experience in STTP exposes students to some, if not all, of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) six core competencies—Patient Care, Medical Knowledge, Practice-based Learning and Improvement, Interpersonal and Communication Skills, Professionalism, and Systems-based Practice. Thus, STTP has been an important aspect of medical education to prepare our students for residency programs. We describe and analyze the STTP as a model system to introduce the ACGME core competencies at an early point in undergraduate medical education. We conclude with a call to provide more mentored anatomical sciences basic and clinically applied research opportunities.



Downloads

PDF  (4.00 MB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)


Sharing


What Your Colleagues Say About Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
My experience in publishing in the Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development was really amazing. The editors were very helpful and their prompt replies made the process easier and faster. Peer reviewers were of high standards, and their remarks were very objective.
Dr Emad Nosair (University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube