Abstract Angelika Merkel and Neil J. Gemmell
School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Abstract
Microsatellites are currently one of the most commonly used genetic markers. The application of bioinformatic tools has become common practice in the study of these short tandem repeats (STR). However, in silico studies can suffer from study bias. Using a meta-analysis on microsatellite distribution in yeast we show that estimates of numbers of repeats reported by different studies can differ in the order of several magnitudes, even within a single genome. These differences arise because varying definitions of microsatellites, spanning repeat size, array length and array composition, are used in different search paradigms, with minimum array length being the main influencing factor. Structural differences in the implemented search algorithm additionally contribute to variation in the number of repeats detected. We suggest that for future studies a consistent approach to STR searches is adopted in order to improve the power of intra- and interspecific comparisons
Discussion
No comments yet...Be the first to comment.
I had an excellent experience publishing our review article in Clinical Medicine Reviews. The managing editor was very helpful and the process was very timely and transparent.Professor Jonathan A. Bernstein (University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Division of Immunology, Allergy Section, Cincinnati, OH, USA) What our authors say
Copyright © 2010 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)