Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics

926,115 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Anidulafungin: Review of its Role in the Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 09 Jun 2011

Type: Review

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics

Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics 2011:3 233-243

doi: 10.4137/CMT.S3153

Abstract

In 2006 a third echinocandin, anidulafungin, was approved in the USA for the treatment of candida esophagitis, candidemia, and invasive candida infections such as intra-abdominal abscesses and peritonitis in the non-neutropenic patient. Two years later it was approved in the EU for invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic patients. Like other echinocandins, it is fungicidal against Candida species and fungistatic against Aspergillus species. It does not need adjustment for renal or hepatic insufficiency, and has no known drug interactions. Its administration is by the intravenous route only, and it is well tolerated. A steady state concentration can be achieved on day two by giving twice the maintenance dose on day one.


Downloads

PDF  (567.01 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)


Sharing




What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics
Traditional vehicles of medical publication could learn constructive lessons of efficiency from the editors of Libertas Academica!
Dr Charles Burger (Professor of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results