Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Evolutionary Bioinformatics

1,160,843 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Analysis of Synonymous Codon Usage Patterns in Seven Different Citrus Species

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 23 May 2013

Type: Original Research

Journal: Evolutionary Bioinformatics

Citation: Evolutionary Bioinformatics 2013:9 215-228

doi: 10.4137/EBO.S11930

Abstract

We used large samples of expressed sequence tags to characterize the patterns of codon usage bias (CUB) in seven different Citrus species and to analyze their evolutionary effect on selection and base composition. We found that A- and T-ending codons are predominant in Citrus species. Next, we identified 21 codons for 18 different amino acids that were considered preferred codons in all seven species. We then performed correspondence analysis and constructed plots for the effective number of codons (ENCs) to analyze synonymous codon usage. Multiple regression analysis showed that gene expression in each species had a constant influence on the frequency of optional codons (FOP). Base composition differences between the proportions were large. Finally, positive selection was detected during the evolutionary process of the different Citrus species. Overall, our results suggest that codon usages were the result of positive selection. Codon usage variation among Citrus genes is influenced by translational selection, mutational bias, and gene length. CUB is strongly affected by selection pressure at the translational level, and gene length plays only a minor role. One possible explanation for this is that the selection-mediated codon bias is consistently strong in Citrus, which is one of the most widely cultivated fruit trees.


Downloads

PDF  (3.86 MB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

Supplementary Files 1  (5.62 MB ZIP FORMAT)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing




What Your Colleagues Say About Evolutionary Bioinformatics
According to my experience as a co-author, I recommend potential authors to publish their innovative bioinformatics work in Evolutionary Bioinformatics.  I am particularly satisfied with the rapid and high-quality review process, proofs delivery and eventual publication.
Dr Leho Tedersoo (University of Tartu, Estonia)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results