Close
Help
Need Help?



Allergic Rhinitis: Focus on the Intranasal Route of Fluticasone Furoate

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 14 Jul 2010

Type: Review

Journal: Clinical Medicine Reviews in Therapeutics

Citation: Clinical Medicine Reviews in Therapeutics 2010:2

doi: 10.4137/CMRT.S1606

Abstract

Fluticasone furoate is a new synthetic steroid structurally related to fluticasone propionate but with a higher affinity for the glucocorticoid receptor. It demonstrates high local efficacy and low systemic availability thus producing maximal efficacy with minimal side effects. Intranasal steroids are recommended first line treatment for allergic rhinitis in both adults and children over 2 years. The safety profile of fluticasone furoate has been evaluated in terms of its plasma concentrations, HPA axis, growth in children and bone metabolism and ocular side effects with no major side effects although further studies are warranted. The potential advantages are the new device which has been developed for delivery which is patient preferred, faster onset of action and a consistent improvement on the ocular symptoms of allergic rhinitis.


Downloads

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)


Sharing

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
I recommend highly Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes as it provides guidance in each step of the publication process. The peer review was also in high quality yet very constructive.
Dr Stanley Kim MD (Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email AlertsRSS Feeds
FacebookGoogle+Twitter
PinterestTumblrYouTube

SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results