Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology

459,847 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Acute Complication Due to Impella 2.5 Device (Superficial Femoral Artery Thrombosis): Managed Successfully with Novel Aspiration Thrombectomy Catheter (Pronto V3)

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 10 Feb 2011

Type: Case report

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology

Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology 2011:5 17-21

doi: 10.4137/CMC.S6157

Abstract

The Impella recover LP 2.5 is a percutaneous left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recently approved for use in patients undergoing high risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and also in cases of cardiogenic shock. There is limited evidence available in literature about its safety, especially with regards to the incidence of local vascular complications, their management and long-term implications. We report here the first case of a serious local vascular complication—superficial femoral artery thrombus formation during Impella recover LP 2.5 use in a high risk PCI which was managed successfully with novel aspiration thrombectomy catheter (Pronto V3), which in itself is the first reported use of Pronto V3 in such a vascular complication.


Downloads

PDF  (1.59 MB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing




What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology
The review process in Libertas Academica journals is prompt, objective and rigorous.  The entire process is smooth and clear and all the editorial staff are cooperative and professional.  Published papers are of top clinical and scientific value, and high metrics reflect the excellent quality of Libertas Academica's journals.
Dr Antoine Kossaify (USEK NDS University Hospital, Byblos, Lebanon)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results