Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology

459,852 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

A Different Way of Coronary Lesion Preparation: Stentablation and Rotastenting

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 20 Feb 2012

Type: Case report

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology

Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology 2012:6 53-56

doi: 10.4137/CMC.S8959

Abstract

Calcified coronary lesions are challenging to deal with, as they require optimal lesion preparation. Direct stenting in this scenario is associated with risk of stent-underexpansion, which is related to in-stent restenosis, target lesion revascularization and stent-thrombosis. We report on the interventional management of an underexpanded bare-metal stent not amenable to high-pressure balloon dilation and cutting-balloon. By using rotablation we could abrade the underexpanded stent struts and the calcification with subsequent implantation of a drug-eluting stent. Follow-up of 6 months revealed good results without evidence of significant restenosis. Our clinical experience and case reports in the literature suggest that this strategy might be an option for underexpanded stents not amenable to conventional techniques.


Downloads

PDF  (685.28 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing




What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology
Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology is very much conscious of time. Every step is done thoroughly and rapidly.  The reviewers' comments are constructive. There is regular contact with the authors, providing explanations where necessary.  The visibility also enjoyed by one's article once it is published is worthy of note.  Thanks for making publishing with you so easy and enjoyable.
Dr Pat Akinwusi (Osun State University and Ladoke Akintola University Teaching Hospital, Osogbo, Nigeria)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results