Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports

372,535 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

A Case of Fahr’s Disease Presenting as Chorea Successfully Treated by the Use of Quetiapine

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 22 Oct 2009

Type: Case Report

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports

Citation: Clinical Medicine: Case Reports 2009:2 63-65

Abstract

We report a case of 30-year-old man presenting chorea in his legs. A brain computed tomography (CT) scan showed bilateral symmetric calcifications in the basal ganglia, thalamus, cerebellum and subcortical white matter. Laboratory studies showed no abnormalities of serum calcium, phosphate, PTH, lactic acid, pyruvic acid and cerebrospinal fluid. Under the diagnosis of Fahr’s disease (FD), we treated with quetiapine (75 mg/day), which completely abolished his symptoms and he showed no other side effect. Our experience suggests that quetiapine is well tolerated in FD patients and effectively treats chorea without extrapyramidal movement.


Downloads

PDF  (1004.67 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)


Sharing


Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports
My experience of publishing my article with Libertas Academia was excellent. They professionally handled the review process. The quality of the reviews were high. I look forward to publishing my scientific papers again with Libertas Academia.
Dr Assy Nimmer (Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results