Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Environmental Health Insights

391,856 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

A Brief Review of Silicosis in the United States

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 18 May 2010

Type: Concise Review

Journal: Environmental Health Insights

Citation: Environmental Health Insights 2010:4 21-26

doi: 10.4137/EHI.S4628

Abstract

Silicosis may be defined as the disease resulting from chronic occupational exposure to silica dust. Silica is primarily composed of quartz dust and has been classified since 2000 as a known human carcinogen by the U.S. government. Silicosis may lead to impairment of lung function resulting from fibrosis of the lungs. This may in turn lead to an increased susceptibility to the development of tuberculosis. Respirable particles are in the size range of less than one micrometer to as large as 30 micrometers. Silicosis is an untreatable, but preventable disease. This review explores the history of silicosis in the U.S. mining industry, including case studies of occupational silicosis.


Downloads

PDF  (456.15 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing




What Your Colleagues Say About Environmental Health Insights
I am very pleased that I submitted my manuscript to Environmental Health Insights. The submission, review and publication were quick and fair.  I hope to submit further papers to the journal.  Thank you very much.
Dr Nguyen Minh Nui (Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Science, Toyama University, Japan)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results